References to the third man
resemble the references to Rosebud in Citizen Kane. In both films, Joseph Cotten
plays the “normal” character, the one against which we measure all the others.
He is our moral reference; if he thinks it is right, we do too.
The amazing atmosphere of the
film, shot in a largely deserted Vienna, full of ruined buildings; a triumph of
exaggerated angles photography with dramatic shadows (Robert Krasker). Much of
the action takes place inside decayed grand palace-like buildings, which have
their own evocative sense.
Locked into the film is a very demeaning female role, that of Alida Valli as Harry Lime’s girlfriend, Alice Schmidt.
Throughout the film, she defends her lover and maintains a kind of “love
triumphs all” attitude. It doesn’t matter what he did, I still love him. It
tells you something about Green’s attitude to women to create such a role; it
has not worn well since 1949, and it made me wince to see such a one-dimensional
character.
Undoubtedly much of the film’s
rather eerie atmosphere comes from the relentlessly upbeat and trivial zither
music. It heightens the feeling of unease and uncertainty that you feel in an
unfamiliar environment, rather than simply being enjoyable for its own sake.
Critics have complained that Orson
Welles makes the character of Harry Lime too appealing. Perhaps the director,
aware that Welles (before he became very overweight) had quite an undergraduate-like
charming face, did what he could to stress the sense of menace by focusing on
his shoes before we see his face. However, apart from his witty line about the
Swiss and cuckoo clocks, he captured reasonably well the attitude of a man who
thinks himself above the law, above usual moral principles. He was certainly
more convincing than Noel Coward, apparently also considered for the part,
would have been
As usual, Greene writes from a
simplistic Catholic point of view. It is astonishing that a major novelist
could depict such a simple world of good and evil. Joseph Cotton is good; the
British forces are good; Harry Lime is evil, as are most of his cronies. If
only the world were so simple. There are times when Greene seems only a
slightly more elaborate version of G K Chesterton with his proselytizing
Sunday-school moral lessons.
Another weakness of the plot is
that Joseph Cotten is supposed to be playing a widely read popular novelist who
writes westerns. Cotton looks far too sensitive and educated to play a
philistine purveyor of popular fiction, and the scene where he gives a talk on
the modern novel falls very flat – because he is unaware of most classic
fiction, but is expected to answer questions on it. That is the scene,
incidentally, highly praised by Pierre Bayard in his How to Talk about Books
you haven’t read, but only because it appealed to Bayard’s very curious fascination
with such unlikely situations.
Nonetheless, despite the one-dimensional
plotting and attitudes, the film remains magnificent. The locations and
camerawork, the stunning images of a deserted, war-damaged Vienna at night. The
empty cafes; the fairground; the dreary rooms; these are images I won’t forget
in a hurry.
It seems perhaps strange that
Carol Reed made only three films considered to be great – Odd Man Out, The Fallen Idol and this
one, all within a few years; his other credits include Oliver! and Trapeze, neither of which sound very exciting. Perhaps that is the nature of film: the
perfect film does not exist, The Third Man is not a masterpiece, but we are grateful
for a few unforgettable moments, perhaps a camera angle, or a human face, or some movement: not, for me, the chase scenes in the sewers of
Vienna, but some of the expressions of fear on people’s faces, or the feeling of
an occupying force trying valiantly but without success to control a horrific
underworld of thieves and betrayal. The final scene, a tree-lined avenue with dead
leaves fluttering down, and Alida Valli walking towards, and then past Joseph Cotton,
is gripping.
No comments:
Post a Comment