I’m reading Barbara Kingsolver’s recent novel Unsheltered (2018). First, I haven’t finished it, and second, it’s the first Kingsolver novel I have read, so my response may be unbalanced, but my reaction to the novel has been somewhat mixed. Let’s start with the difficulties:
First, the novel is
narrated by the author herself. What could be more authentic? But Ms Kingsolver
has a very lilting delivery. Although it is perfectly intelligible, she makes
the content seem almost sugary. I find the experience of reading the text,
rather than having it read to me, and imagining the characters for myself, a
much more balanced experience.
The novel itself is
vast, and incredibly detailed. We know when the baby's nappies are changed, and if he has started on solid food yet. It’s as if Northrop Frye in his Anatomy of Criticism
had created one additional mode, the ultra-Ironic, where we sit watching the
clock ticking.
As for the plot, alternating
chapters present two separate narratives, linked because they take place in a
single, decrepit house – hence the term “unsheltered”. The present-day story is
based around Willa Knox and her family. Willa is sharing her house with her
husband, two grown-up children, Tig and Zeke, a new-born grandchild, and
her elderly father-in-law. Willa discovers that a pioneering female scientist
lived in the neighbourhood in the 19th century. As the book blurb states: Could
this historical connection be enough to save their home from ruin? And can
Willa, despite the odds, keep her family together?
In parallel with
the modern story is a 19th-century historical narrative, about Greenwood
Thatcher, a biology teacher, his struggles to introduce his students to
Darwinian evolution, and his meeting with the real pioneering botanist, Mary
Treat, who corresponded with Charles Darwin.
Although I have
only read two-thirds of the novel, I don’t think it really matters what will
happen by the end.
The rather worthy
theme of the 19th-century plot is the opposition of Creationism and Darwinian
evolution. Greenwood Thatcher is trying to introduce his pupils to the theory
of evolution, while the school principal firmly resists any departure from a
Biblical interpretation. Unfortunately, this plot is hammered to us repeatedly
and insistently, and we of course from the benefit of hindsight know that
Thatcher is right; it doesn’t make for much drama. I feel as if I were reading a gently dramatized version of an introduction to 19th-century views on evolution by a well-meaning secondary school teacher, who makes it very clear indeed what the right interpretation is. Secretly, I admire the school principal (although perhaps that's just my perversity).
The present-day
plot concerns the efforts of Willa to protect her family in the ramshackle old
building that is structurally unsound. A less charitable interpretation might
be a mother’s forlornly clawing back her children from their adult life, trying
to pretend they never stopped being dependent. The novel is narrated from Willa’s
point of view, so we never learn what the now adult children think of their
mother’s behaviour.
The modern plot of Unsheltered is very maternal. Willa likes to have something to worry about, and continues
to fret about her offspring even after they have fled the family home. Their
return, whether or not intentional, is an opportunity for her to care for them
even more, to provide Wilma, with something to worry about. Perhaps this
represents an entirely new strand in the novel: after the epistolary novel, the
confessional novel, the picaresque novel, here is the maternal novel:
everything in the present-day narrative is narrated from the point of view of
the mother. While the mother may not be Kingsolver, the combination of the
maternal concerns and the winsome narrative voice grates on this listener.
Overall, the novel
is rather insistent in pushing its points home, and at the same time rather
idealistic, while being almost smug in its defence of bourgeois family values.
By way of example, Kingsolver was criticized for a Los Angeles Times opinion
piece following the U.S. bombing of Afghanistan in the wake of the September 11 attacks. She wrote, "I
feel like I'm standing on a playground where the little boys are all screaming
at each other, 'He started it!' and throwing rocks that keep taking out another
eye, another tooth. I keep looking around for somebody's mother to come on the
scene saying, 'Boys! Boys! Who started it cannot possibly be the issue here.
People are getting hurt."
The present-day
plot of Unsheltered seems almost to be a plea for the mother’s point of view. A
typical exchange is between Willa and her son Zeke:
“Your dad always
used to carry Tig on his shoulders like that in crowds. So she could see more
than just people’s belt buckles. Remember?”
“I remember
childhood, yes. I understood it was supposed to end.”
“Of course.” People
like Willa and Zeke never stopped being surprised when it didn’t.
And here are some
typical Kingsolver views:
It kills you to see them grow up.
But I guess it would kill you quicker if they didn't.
Sometimes the strength of
motherhood is greater than natural laws.
If you see the world like that, you will enjoy Unsheltered.
No comments:
Post a Comment