James Woodforde was a parson of a Norfolk country church for
27 years. In principle, his diary could be a unique insight into rural life in
the 18th century, but I found it an excruciating read. In a word, Woodforde is complacent. For
example, pretty much every entry in the diary begins as follows:
I breakfasted, supped and slept
again at home.
The reader might think, because the author has not moved
house, that such a detail is not worth recording – at least not repeating the
same sentence thousands of times. For Woodforde, it seems a significant guide
to his character. Habit, repetition, the daily round, is good. He records:
·
How much money he gave away in charitable
donations - but he doesn’t mention the much larger sums he received in tithes
from his parishioners. According to Wikipedia, the living of his parish was
worth £400 per year.
·
How much money he won or lost playing at cards
·
How much he spent on travel.
·
What he cooked or ate.
Does anything else motivate Woodforde? Not religion.
Woodforde’s faith is of the “minimal folk superstition” variety. Religion is only
mentioned when someone dies, is born, gets married, of if something exceptional
happens. There is no questioning or investigation of faith. Typical references
to religion are:
I got to Ansford, I thank God safe and well this evening about 6 o’clock [Feb 1st 1764]
I … married my Sister Jane and Mr Pouncett by license. Pray God send Thy Blessing upon them both, and may they be happy in each other. [May 24 1774]
Thank God Almighty, for preserving us all safe from so violent a Tempest. [Aug 10 1787]
As for positive aspects of the diary, they seem to be an
excellent depiction of the unthinking life at Oxford in the 18th-century: Woodforde
records drinking, competing for livings, and disciplining undergraduates who
drink too much, but no mention of any learning. These are the words of a complacent
fellow.
The Buildings are
grand at Cambridge but few of them [May 22 1776]
Quite a Summer’s
day and exceeding fair.
Had a letter this
evening from my Sister Pounsett.
Had another from
Dr. Oglander, Warden of New
Coll: Oxford, in
answer to mine, and very satis-
factory it was.
Five poor unhappy young men were
hanged this day
at Norwich, for divers misdemeanours,
at the last
Assizes they were condemned — Bell, Boddy,
Bridges,
Partridge and Gryfin, none of them but
what were quite
young, but Villains … [April 3 1778]
The effect of the diary is smug and soporific. Worse, it brings
into question the whole nature of diary writing. Must writing a journal be as
egocentric and complacent as this? What makes a good personal diary or journal?
Montaigne’s writings are a fierce self-examination, carried out over many years.
Sartre describes his childhood with merciless condemnation of the people about
him. Boswell’s journals are a masterpiece of self-assurance accompanied by the less
comfortable reality he encounters. He is enthusiastic. Where is Woodforde’s
excitement?
No comments:
Post a Comment